По-русски

Campus within a Day

In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.

11 June 2024
Report
mainImg
Few would agree that a university campus project, even a small one, can be created in just a day, even in its most preliminary concept form. Nevertheless, we know that such things do happen sometimes. Another thing that we know is that hackathons are popular because they mobilize both feelings and thoughts in people.

In our case, the work took place at an exhibition – a well-known approach where the design team becomes a sort of exhibit in itself. Evgeny Ace tried this many years ago at a biennale – and, interestingly, one of the teams won a significant prize: 150,000 rubles. There was something to compete for beyond professional growth, and it was worth staying up for 24 hours.

The brainstorming session took place at the MosComArchitecture stand, which also showcased three new Moscow campuses in various stages of readiness: the Lomonosov cluster in the Moscow State University Valley, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, and the master plan for Moscow State University of Civil Engineering located on Yaroslavskoye Highway.

  • zooming
    The teams were working at the Moscomarchitecture stand behind a polycarbonate wall, but it was possible to take a sneak peek inside
    Copyright: Photograph © Provided by Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    The MCA booth where the hackathon was held was dedicated to the new Moscow campuses, with three projects of varying degrees of readiness displayed on the outside of the stand in the form of a prismatron
    Copyright: Photograph © Provided by Genplan Institute of Moscow


Students participating in the hackathon were asked to come up with proposals for the territory of Moscow City Pedagogical University. All three teams worked on the same task but autonomously, and on different days.

The university in question is small and located in the eastern part of Moscow, on the edge of a district nestled between Izmailovo and the Moscow Ring Road; it is bordered by a park on two sides. The campus includes two academic buildings, one built in 1987 and the other in 2002, both three stories high, with a characteristic cross-like plan aimed at maximizing light exposure in the classrooms – charming buildings with calm white-pink facades, and an 11-story dormitory deeper in the territory. There is practically no landscaping on the grounds, although some time ago it was the site of the only landscape design college in the country. Currently, the faculties of natural sciences and sports are located here. The entire territory is fenced, and inside, besides the three buildings, there is a square with a characteristic circular path and an open stadium situated next to the eastern boundary.

  • zooming
    Tatiana Guk announces the winner of the hackathon at the stand of the MCA and the Genplan Institute of Moscow
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    The winner announcement. The hackathon organized by Genplan Institute of Moscow and MosComArchitectura at ArchMoscow 2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


As expected in our times, the proposals leaned towards creating public spaces, co-working areas, and overpasses between buildings – surprisingly absent until now. Additionally, there was a focus on at least partially opening up the campus to the city and local residents: two teams suggested a thoroughfare running through the campus to the park, while one team concentrated on “intensifying” the only city street adjoining the university grounds, notably named after the architect Chechulin.

All the contestants worked heroically and showed interesting results – as much as it is at all possible when brainstorming is limited to just one day. Such experiments are useful both for students and tutors – and for the university too; we saw the interest of the customer, a representative of Moscow City University was on the jury and it is obvious that the ideas expressed by the participants aroused the interest of the university administration.

Yes, the prize went to just one team – that was the rule in this case – but I would like to emphasize that each proposal had its own strengths. Appreciating the efforts of all teams, we decided to award two second places in addition to the first.


There is one winner and two second-place holders:

1st Place / Poznanie (“Cognition”)

Team 3, the authors of “Cognition” project
Copyright: Photograph © Provided by Genplan Institute of Moscow


Curators: Alexander Kotenkov, Deputy Head of the Department of Prospective Projects at the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Maria Pomelova, architectural company “Chekharda”
Students: Alina Arakcheeva / MITU-MASI, Margarita Vykhodtseva / MARKHI, Anastasia Gavrik / GUZ, Anastasia Gracheva / SPbPU, Valeria Degtyareva / MARCH, Ksenia Kaspirovich / MARKHI, Alexander Kovriga / MARKHI, Igor Oskolkov / KGASU, Nikita Pavlov / HSE, Kamilya Khiyasova / GUZ, Anna Chvilyova / KubSU


  • zooming
    The hackathon organized by Genplan Institute of Moscow and MosComArchitectura at ArchMoscow 2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Provided by Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    The hackathon organized by Genplan Institute of Moscow and MosComArchitectura at ArchMoscow 2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


This team, the largest, worked on the last day and was known for pulling an all-nighter to complete their project, resulting in the most visual content. However, as noted by Andrey Gnezdilov, there was no “master plan” – the team didn’t present an actual transformation plan for the campus territory but rather focused on a collection of proposals not consolidated into a cohesive whole. Perhaps this was for the best, as they offered numerous “growth points”.

“Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3


Like other teams, they proposed utilizing the park but, unlike their peers, extended a bridge to it: on the western end of the park, they placed a stage, and on the eastern end, in a nook of the academic building, a summer cinema. Another “performance space” predictably found its place in the square. The stadium remained in the eastern part, where it originally was.

The team connected the dormitory and the two academic buildings with overpasses; naturally, these are necessary. However, the function of the old (eastern) building remains uncertain after the Design and Technology Faculty moved out in 2015. In the building’s northeast corner, the team proposed a winter garden combined with a covered walkway.

The conceptual framework of the project was defined by the architects as activating different senses: taste, sight, hearing, touch, smell... Additionally, they proposed a “sensory alley” along the city street where all these senses converge. This is a beautiful approach to explaining the functional program, making the campus image less dull. The only questionable element might be the “Five Senses” art object proposed by the team, which resembles a lollipop with five legs. However, its role in this rapid research is minimal.

  • zooming
    1 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    2 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    3 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    4 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    5 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    6 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    7 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3
  • zooming
    8 / 8
    “Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3


The architects also made several charming, specific proposals: for instance, a bike parking area with hanging bicycles (although the area seems large enough for regular bike parking) and summer-only solitude capsules.

“Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3


Nonetheless, it’s not surprising that the project impressed the jury with its thoroughness and the understated charm of its details without aiming for large-scale interventions. The only significant interventions here could be the two overpasses and the winter garden.

“Cognition” project, the hackathon winner
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 3


The “Cognition” project team was also the only one to include a detailed analysis of the campus’s transport accessibility in their urban planning review.

2nd Place / Wheat Alley

Team 1, the authors of the Campus City project
Copyright: Photograph © Provided by Genplan Institute of Moscow


Curators: Sergey Lukyanenko, Head of the Workshop on Urban Environment Design, Genplan Institute of Moscow; Milan Stamenkovich, Head of the Conceptual Department, Pride Union.
Students: Elizaveta Usova, Nikita Pishchaev, Polina Lukianchuk, Kristina Babenko, Daria Ivanushkina, Arseniy Yezhov, Vladislav Paschinsky, Anastasia Kostenko, Daria Petrushina, Tatyana Chesnokova


  • zooming
    Tatiana Guk announces the winner of the hackathon at the stand of the MCA and the Genplan Institute of Moscow
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru
  • zooming
    The hackathon organized by Genplan Institute of Moscow and MosComArchitectura at ArchMoscow 2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


This project’s distinguishing feature is the relatively active intervention of the proposed structures into the context of the area. In other words, while Team 3 only suggested points, themes, and references for further development, the second team provided very specific and detailed drawings in three types of graphics: a site plan in fashionable axonometry, an introduction styled like comics, and a 3D cartoonish character named “Universie”.

  • zooming
    Wheat Alley, 2nd place
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 2
  • zooming
    2nd Place / Wheat Alley
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 2


In short, it was obvious that the team members could draw well and in various styles – a useful skill in our era dominated by presentations.

The second team was the only one of the three that did not propose connections between the dormitory and the academic buildings, nor did they focus on creating a passage through the area from the city to the park. Their proposal distinctly reads as consisting of two parts: the first runs along the street and connects mini-cafes and entrance groups into a sort of wall. The second consists of several pavilions on the territory, connected by a winding “roof” path deeper within the area.

Wheat Alley, 2nd place
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 2


Notably, this team, in addition to the three types of quality graphics, also brought a 3D model to the presentation.

The hackathon organized by Genplan Institute of Moscow and MosComArchitectura at ArchMoscow 2024
Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


As mentioned, the project includes a lot of buildings: two amphitheaters, one being a sports amphitheater in addition to the stadium in its original place, another for entertainment, and a third circular “circus.”

Wheat Alley, 2nd place
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 2


The most obvious drawback of the proposal is that the “roof” path is distributed rather randomly across the area, and the architects seemed to forget about the shortest paths. The greatest strength was the presentation, which was energetic to the point of theatricality, though perhaps a bit too much at times.

2nd Place / Campus-City

  • zooming
    Team 1, the authors of the Campus City project
    Copyright: Photograph © Provided by Genplan Institute of Moscow
  • zooming
    The hackathon organized by Genplan Institute of Moscow and MosComArchitectura at ArchMoscow 2024
    Copyright: Photograph © Julia Tarabarina, Archi.ru


Curators: Anastasia Agafonkina, Viktor Obvintsev
Students: Ekaterina Repan, Anna Merkulova, Alisa Murashova, Ekaterina Yatsenko, Amrita Dhali, Svetlana Vavrina, Egor Chernykh, Nikita Mazhuga


The team that worked on the first day of the hackathon created a project with the most “traditional” presentation style, following the rules of master plan professionals.

Campus City project
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 1


Their proposal includes activating the park, creating a daytime thoroughfare for city residents (which could be closed at night for safety), as well as overpassing connecting the dormitory and the academic buildings. The architects expanded the existing sports ground with a larger stadium in the center of the area, acknowledging the campus’s sports specialization. They also proposed an additional entrance group on the western side, but as a ground passage rather than a bridge, and an “accent” square at the sharp corner on the western side. The difference is that the square features a fountain instead of an art object. In this project, the square becomes the main public space due to its central location: the architects cover it with a non-linear “wing” canopy. The place hosts a co-working space, museum, cafeteria, and another symmetrical wing serving as a canopy over a new academic building.

Campus City project
Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 1


The project strikes a reasonable balance between new structures and their utility, despite somewhat lackluster graphics – a potential drawback that might have affected the otherwise strong proposal.

  • zooming
    The open and closed territories. Campus City project
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 1
  • zooming
    Pre-project research: sociocultural anthropology. Campus-City Project
    Copyright: Hackathon of the Genplan Institute of Moscow, Group 1


The Campus-City project was most explicitly oriented towards opening the area for joint use by the university and city residents. However, it’s evident that not all solutions to the challenging task of combining openness and security were thoroughly considered by the architects. Nonetheless, this challenge is likely one of those that cannot be fully addressed within a single day.

11 June 2024

Headlines now
​A Brick Shell
In the process of designing a clubhouse situated among pine trees in a prestigious suburban area near Moscow, the architectural firm “A.Len” did the façade design part. The combination of different types of brick and masonry correlates with the volumetric and plastique solutions, further enhanced by the inclusion of wood-painted fragments and metal “glazing”.
Word Forms
ATRIUM architects love ambitious challenges, and for the firm’s thirtieth anniversary, they boldly play a game of words with an exhibition that dives deep into a self-created vocabulary. They immerse their projects – especially art installations – into this glossary, as if plunging into a current of their own. You feel as if you’re flowing through the veins of pure art, immersed in a universe of vertical cities, educational spaces – of which the architects are true masters – and the cultural codes of various locations. But what truly captivates is the bold statement that Vera Butko and Anton Nadtochy make, both through their work and this exhibition: architecture, above all, is art – the art of working with form and space.
Flexibility and Acuteness of Modernity
Luxurious, fluid, large “kokoshniks” and spiral barrel columns, as if made from colorful chewing gum: there seem to be no other mansion like this in Moscow, designed in the “Neo-Russian-Modern” style. And the “Teremok” on Malaya Kaluzhskaya, previously somewhat obscure, has “come alive with new colors” and gained visibility after its restoration for the office of the “architectural ecosystem” as the architects love to call themselves. It’s evident that Julius Borisov and the architects at UNK put their hearts into finding this new office and bringing it up to date. Let’s delve into the paradoxes of this mansion’s history and its plasticity. Spoiler: two versions of modernity meet here, both balancing on the razor’s edge of “what’s current”.
Yuri Vissarionov: “A modular house does not belong to the land”
It belongs to space, or to the air... It turns out that 3D printing is more effective when combined with a modular approach: the house is built in a workshop and then adapted to the site, including on uneven terrain. Yuri Vissarionov shares his latest experience in designing tourist complexes, both in central Russia and in the south. These include houseboats, homes printed from lightweight concrete using a 3D printer, and, of course, frame houses.
​Moscow’s First
“The quality of education largely depends on the quality of the educational environment”. This principle of the last decade has been realized by Sergey Skuratov in the project for the First Moscow Gymnasium on Rostovskaya Embankment in the Khamovniki district. The building seamlessly integrates into the complex urban landscape, responding both to the pedestrian flow of the city and the quiet alleyways. It skillfully takes advantage of the height differences and aligns with modern trends in educational space design. Let’s take a closer look.
Looking at the Water
The site of Villa Sonata stretches from the road to the water’s edge, offering its own shoreline, pier, and a picturesque river panorama. To reveal these sweeping views, Roman Leonidov “cut” the façade diagonally parallel to the river, thus getting two main axes for the house and, consequently, “two heads”. The internal core – two double-height spaces, a living room and a conservatory, with a “bridge” above them – makes the house both “transparent” and filled with light.
The White Wing
Well, it’s not exactly white. It’s more of a beige, white-stone structure that plays with the color of limestone – smoother surfaces are lighter, while rougher ones are darker. This wing unites various elements: it absorbs and interprets the surrounding themes. It responds to everything, yet maintains a cohesive expression – a challenging task! – while also incorporating recognizable features of its own, such as the dynamic cuts at the bottom, top, and middle.
Urban Dunes
The XSA Ramps team designed and built a three-part sports hub for a park in Rostov-on-Don, welcoming people of all ages and fitness levels. The skate plaza, pump track, and playground are all meticulously crafted with details that attract a diverse range of visitors. The technical execution of the shapes and slopes transforms this space into a kind of sculptural composition.
Proportional Growth
The project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential area has been announced. The buildings are situated on an elongated plot – almost a “ray” that shoots out from the center of the area towards the river. Their layout reflects both a response to Moscow’s architectural preferences over the past 15 years, shifting “from blocks to towers”, and an interpretation of the neighboring business park designed by SOM. Additionally, the best apartments here are not located at the very top but closer to the middle, forming a glowing “waistline”.
The “Staircase” Building
In designing the “Details” residential complex in New Moscow, Rais Baishev spiced up the now-popular Moscow theme of a “courtyard” building with an idea drawn from the surrealist drawings by Maurits Escher. He envisioned the stepped silhouettes and descending slopes as a metaphysical mega-staircase, creating a key void within the courtyard that gave the project an internal “spine”. This concept is felt both in the building’s silhouette and on its façades.
Projection of the Quarter
No one doubted that the building that Vladimir Plotkin designed as part of the “Garden Quarters” would be the most modernist of all. And it turned out just that way: while adhering to the common design code, the building successfully combines brick and white stone, rhythmically responding to the neighboring building designed by Ostozhenka, yet tactfully and persistently making a few statements of its own. This includes the projection of the ideal urban development composition “14–9–6”, which can be found right next door, mathematical calculations, including those for various types of terraces (and perhaps the only reminder of the Soviet past of the Kauchuk rubber factory!), and the white “cross-stitch” pattern of the façade grid.
Domus Aurea
In this issue, we examine the “Tessinsky-1” house, designed by Sergey Skuratov and completed in 2023. Located in the middle of the Serebryanicheskaya Embankment district, at the intersection of its main streets, this house assumes a sort of “nodal” role: it not only responds to everything around it and preserves many memories of the former EMA factory within itself, but it weaves all this into a newly directed pattern, reconciling bright “gold” and dark-colored brick, largely with the help of the new, modern-yet-archaic Columba brick, which, come to think about it, is the most precious element here.
The Chimney of Nikola-Lenivets
In this issue, we are examining the “Obelisk House” designed by KATARSIS and built for the Arkhstoyanie 2023 festival. However, it was only finished later on, and this is why we are examining it now. It seems to us that after the “Obelisk House” appeared in Nikola-Lenivets, a dialogue and a few inner connections appeared between the temporary structures built here. These houses no longer look like “accidental neighbors”, more of which below.
​Periscope by the Bay
The jury awarded the second place in the competition for a public and cultural center in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to the companies GORA (“Mountain”) and M4. In the consortium’s proposal, the building resembles a sperm whale with a calf swimming next to it or a periscope, whose lenses capture the most spectacular views from the surrounding landscape.
From Arcs to Dolmens
While working on the competition project for Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, ASADOV Architects prioritized the value of the natural and urban environment, aiming to preserve the balance of the location while minimizing the resemblance of the volume that they designed to a “traditional building”. The task was challenging, and the architects created three versions, one of which having been developed after the competition, where their main proposal took third place. However, the point of interest here is not the competition result but the continuity of creative thinking.
Hide and Seek
The ID Moskovskiy house, designed by Stepan Liphart in St. Petersburg, in the courtyards near Moskovskiy Avenue beyond the Obvodny Canal and recently completed, is notable for several reasons. Firstly, it has been realized with considerable accuracy, which is particularly significant as this is the first building where the architect was responsible not only for the facades but also for the layouts, allowing for better integration between the two. On the other hand, this building is interesting as an example of the “germination” of new architecture in the city: it draws on the best examples from the neighborhood and becomes an improved and developed sum of ideas found by the architect in the surrounding context.
The Big Twelve
Yesterday, the winners of the Moscow Mayor’s Architecture Award were announced and honored. Let’s take a look at what was awarded and, in some cases, even critique this esteemed award. After all, there is always room for improvement, right?
Above the Golden Horn
The residential complex “Philosophy” designed by T+T architects in Vladivostok, is one of the new projects in the “Golubinaya Pad” area, changing its development philosophy (pun intended) from single houses to a comprehensive approach. The buildings are organized along public streets, varying in height and format, with one house even executed in gallery typology, featuring a cantilever leaning on an art object.
Nuanced Alternative
How can you rhyme a square and space? Easily! But to do so, you need to rhyme everything you can possibly think of: weave everything together, like in a tensegrity structure, and find your own optics too. The new exhibition at GES-2 does just that, offering its visitor a new perspective on the history of art spanning 150 years, infused with the hope for endless multiplicity of worlds and art histories. Read on to see how this is achieved and how the exhibition design by Evgeny Ace contributes to it.
Blinds for Ice
An ice arena has been constructed in Domodedovo based on a project by Yuri Vissarionov Architects. To prevent the long façade, a technical requirement for winter sports facilities, from appearing monotonous, the architects proposed the use of suspended structures with multidirectional slats. This design protects the ice from direct sunlight while giving the wall texture and detail.
Frozen Magma
A competition for the creation of a public and cultural center was held in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Three architectural companies made it to the final, and we consider it important to share about the work of each. Let’s start with the winner – the consortium led by Wowhaus.
Campus within a Day
In this article, we talk about what the participants of Genplan Institute of Moscow’s hackathon were doing at the MosComArchitecture booth at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition. We also discuss who won the prize and why, and what can be done with the territory of a small university on the outskirts of Moscow.
Vertical Civilization
Genpro considered the development of the vertical city concept and made it the theme of their pavilion at the “ArchMoscow” exhibition.
Marina Yegorova: “We think in terms of hectares, not square meters”
The career path of architect Marina Yegorova is quite impressive: MARHI, SPEECH, MosComArchitectura, the Genplan Institute of Moscow, and then her own architectural company. Its name Empate, which refers to the words “to draw” in Portuguese and “to empathize” in English, should not be misleading with its softness, as the firm freely works on different scales, including Integrated Territorial Development projects. We talked with Marina about various topics: urban planning experience, female leadership style, and even the love of architects for yachting.
Andrey Chuikov: “Optimum balance is achieved through economics”
The Yekaterinburg-based architectural company CNTR is in its mature stage: crystallization of principles, systematization, and standardization helped it make a qualitative leap, enhance competencies, and secure large contracts without sacrificing the aesthetic component. The head of the company, Andrey Chuikov, told us about building a business model and the bonuses that additional education in financial management provides for an architect.
The Fulcrum
Ostozhenka Architects have designed two astonishing towers practically on the edge of a slope above the Oka River in Nizhny Novgorod. These towers stand on 10-meter-tall weathered steel “legs”, with each floor offering panoramic views of the river and the city; all public spaces, including corridors, receive plenty of natural light. Here, we see a multitude of solutions that are unconventional for the residential routine of our day and age. Meanwhile, although these towers hark back to the typological explorations of the seventies, they are completely reinvented in a contemporary key. We admire Veren Group as the client – this is exactly how a “unique product” should be made – and we tell you exactly how our towers are arranged.
Crystal is Watching You
Right now, Museum Night has kicked off at the Museum of Architecture, featuring a fresh new addition – the “Crystal of Perception”, an installation by Sergey Kuznetsov, Ivan Grekov, and the KROST company, set up in the courtyard. It shimmers with light, it sings, it reacts to the approach of people, and who knows what else it can do.
The Secret Briton
The house is called “Little France”. Its composition follows the classical St. Petersburg style, with a palace-like courtyard. The decor is on the brink of Egyptian lotuses, neo-Greek acroteria, and classic 1930s “gears”; the recessed piers are Gothic, while the silhouette of the central part of the house is British. It’s quite interesting to examine all these details, attempting to understand which architectural direction they belong to. At the same time, however, the house fits like a glove in the context of the 20th line of St. Petersburg’s Vasilievsky Island; its elongated wings hold up the façade quite well.
The Wrap-Up
The competition project proposed by Treivas for the first 2021 competition for the Russian pavilion at EXPO 2025 concludes our series of publications on pavilion projects that will not be implemented. This particular proposal stands out for its detailed explanations and the idea of ecological responsibility: both the facades and the exhibition inside were intended to utilize recycled materials.
Birds and Streams
For the competition to design the Omsk airport, DNK ag formed a consortium, inviting VOX architects and Sila Sveta. Their project focuses on intersections, journeys, and flights – both of people and birds – as Omsk is known as a “transfer point” for bird migrations. The educational component is also carefully considered, and the building itself is filled with light, which seems to deconstruct the copper circle of the central entrance portal, spreading it into fantastic hyper-spatial “slices”.