По-русски

Terraced Design

The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.

10 December 2024
Object
mainImg
The “River Park” project was completed in 2024 and is significant in scale. We have covered it multiple times: the initial phase, located in the southern section, was designed by Ostozhenka Architects in 2013. Beginning in 2017, Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova of ADM Architects took over the design of the larger portion of the complex, ultimately completing five blocks. The first group in Phase II, labeled Blocks 1-3 internally, lines the northern edge along the Nagatinsky Backwater. Blocks 4-5 extend and conclude the waterfront development, occupying a corner between two water bodies and the shoreline of the Western Bay.

“River Park” housing complex
Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


Thus, “River Park” represents a decade-long effort overall, with ADM Architects contributing seven years – a substantial timeline in itself. All the blocks are connected by a public embankment featuring shops, cafes, and salons on the ground floors. Across the development, albeit to varying extents, there is a prevailing theme of terraced volumes descending toward the water and terraces. The design and realization coincided with the burgeoning interest of Moscow developers and buyers in open terraces, with this project serving as one where it became evident during construction that apartments with terraces were in higher demand and ultimately sold better.

The two-thirds of the complex designed by ADM Architects are characterized by a blend of strict regularity – at times even rigid structure – the dominance of brick, and persistent efforts to incorporate sculptural accents. These accents range from subtle to almost megalithic: bold and confident gestures.

Notably, the architects here abandoned the vertical pairing of floors in groups of two or three, opting instead for an “honest” grid that balances vertical and horizontal elements. By day, the buildings appear distinctly solid and sculpted with confidence. By night, under backlighting and silhouetted against the sky, they resemble volumetric frameworks with irregularly filled segments, their edges seemingly torn open. Illuminated windows, like pieces in a sliding puzzle, further enhance the perception of lightness.

“River Park” housing complex
Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


ADM Architects introduced the idea of alternating end terraces within the volumes in “River Park” for the first time. This architectural ingenuity enhances privacy between neighbors.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


The result is a rigorously organized version of a “Habitat” form, with a confident cascade of open steps framed by frameless glass railings that subtly highlight the façades.

Moreover, “River Park” became a testing ground for creating semi-public and private spaces for residents. All blocks are interconnected by pedestrian bridges and archways, allowing the courtyards to be navigated from above. These upper areas feature various playgrounds for children and designated relaxation zones for adults, such as barbecue equipment.

“River Park” housing complex: blocks 1-3
Copyright: Photograph © Yaroslav Lukyanchenko / provided by ADM


The architects also began exploring new approaches to form here. While plate-like “shifts” of floors were first implemented in the Discovery residential complex back in 2015, “River Park” introduced upward-expanding brick folds. These folds, particularly in certain perspectives, make the buildings resemble flowers. Could this have been the precursor to ADM Architects’ later experiments with tower plastique?

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex: blocks 1-3
    Copyright: Photograph © Yaroslav Lukyanchenko / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex: blocks 1-3
    Copyright: Photograph © yaroslav Lukyanchenko / provided by ADM


The recently completed blocks continue the methods and approaches developed in Blocks 1-3 but interpret them more strikingly.

One key reason for this evolution is the site’s location on a corner – not an urban corner in the traditional sense of the term, but a riverine one. The 90° angle aligns with the confluence of the man-made backwater, the bay, the Nagatinsky Channel, and the Moskva River itself. Historically, this area featured a functional beacon during its port days. Now, a symbolic lighthouse stands on the square where the shoreline makes a turn.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


Yet the project’s most striking feature is not the tower or the protrusion – but the void, more of which below.

Two light, terraced volumes are positioned not perpendicular but parallel to the shores, utilizing the right-angle meeting of water masses. The end terraces of one building face the Western Bay, while those of the other overlook the Nagatinsky Backwater.

Between the two structures, an open space ascends, creating a pause that serves as a central architectural highlight. This void mirrors the gap between the two shores and even visualizes it, amplifying its presence through the layered plates of the buildings.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex. Section view
    Copyright: © ADM


While the terraces rise uniformly and evenly, the height of the wings varies, creating a balance between symmetry and asymmetry. Interestingly, the height difference between the two volumes reflects the lengths of the water bodies they face – Western Bay being in fact shorter than the Nagatinsky Backwater. This is a nuanced contextual response, as is the interplay with the land’s narrow isthmus.

“River Park” housing complex
Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


At the “meeting point” of the two volumes, on the corner, a public terrace emerges at the height of three floors. This terrace functions as an intimate courtyard-like space for gatherings and small events. From here, one can see the courtyard, the promenade, and the water, as well as enjoy a unique perspective of the terraces ascending in opposite directions.

“River Park” housing complex
Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


The two wings of the corner building resemble sails in silhouette, with the gap between them forming an inverted triangle. The triangular outline is echoed by the plan of the neighboring red-brick tower. This tower is a rare example in ADM’s portfolio, with no comparable structures currently attributed to the company. Its triangular footprint tapers toward the water, and the façades feature prominent open balconies with copper-toned underlays.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


These two buildings are both rhythmic and jagged, engaging dynamically with the surrounding space, perhaps even more so than the terraces. Their design creates a unique volumetric pattern rooted in modernist principles and represents the most original accent in the entire complex. Walking along the promenade and rounding the corner offers the best view of this feature.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


In contrast, the design of the two other buildings situated further back is more subdued and forms a quieter backdrop. Behind the corner building, there is a straightforward red-brick structure with a grid of square façades and a square footprint. When viewed from the plan, this building complements the triangular house, forming a pair. However, the further structure is far more restrained in its execution.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: © ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex. Phase II. Overall plan, Phase 2
    Copyright: © ADM


To the west, the backdrop is defined by a light, folded plate-like structure and a closing dark-brown building. While the former echoes the red “bouquet” buildings from clusters 1-3, the latter showcases a restrained yet dynamic slope, a favorite technique of Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova’s. Similar “steps” can be found in their other works, such as along the Novodanilovskaya Embankment or in the recently completed HIDE residential complex.

  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM
  • zooming
    “River Park” housing complex
    Copyright: Photograph © Andrey Belimov-Gushchin / provided by ADM


From certain angles, the buildings of “River Park” evoke a Manhattan-like aesthetic: a strict yet varied alignment. The skyline remains undisturbed, held confidently in place. Within a context that is partially “micro-district” in character and partially shaped by the natural, scenic freedom of the landscape, the structures stand out evenly and neatly, featuring a respectable brick palette. They create a city by the water where none existed before. This approach resonates well with the architectural agenda of Moscow in the 2010s, reflecting a precise and professional response to the project”s objectives. However, what stands out is the presence of another emerging narrative – less restrained, more expressive and sculptural. Built on patterns and understated yet bold gestures, the regular slopes of the terraces, with their functional alternation, evoke not only a tamed vision of “Habitat” but also modernist pyramid houses and triangular structures. Here, one can discern both continuity with the past and a glimpse into the future – a precursor to larger-scale experiments in the development of Moscow River’s waterfront areas.

10 December 2024

Headlines now
Elevation 5642
The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.
The IT Town
Taking the example of the first completed phase of the “U” district, we examine how the new neighborhood in Innopolis will be organized. T+T Architects and HADAA formed a well-balanced and ingenious master plan with different types of housing, a green artery, a system of squares, and a park in the town’s central part.
The Heart Lies Within
The second-phase building of the Evgeny Primakov School already won multiple awards while still in the design stage. Now that it’s completed, some unfinished nuances remain – most notably, the exposed ceiling structures, which ideally should have been concealed. However, given the priority placed on the building’s volumetric composition, this does not seem critical. What matters more is the “Wow!” effect created by the space itself.
Magnetic Forces
“Krylatskaya 33” is the first large-scale residential complex to appear amidst the 1980s “micro-districts” that harmoniously coexist with the forests, the river, the slopes, and the sports infrastructure. Despite its imposing scale, the architects of Ostozhenka managed to turn the complex into something that can be best described as a “graceful dominant”. First, they designed the complex with consideration for the style and height of the surrounding micro-districts. Second, by introducing a pause in its tallest section, they created compositional tension – right along the urban planning axis of the area.
Orion’s Belt
The Stone Khodynka 2 office complex, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten for the company Stone, is built with an ergonomic layout following “healthy building” principles: natural light, ventilation, and all the necessary features for an efficient office environment. On the outside, it resembles – like many contemporary buildings – an iPhone: sleek, glowing, glass-and-metal, edges elegantly rounded. Yet, it responds sensitively to the Khodynka context, where the main theme is the contrast between vertical and horizontal lines. The key intrigue lies in the design of the “stylobate” as a suspended passage, leaving the space beneath it open for free pedestrian movement.
Grigory Revzin: “It Was a Bold Statement Made on the Sly. Something Won”
In this article, we discuss the debates surrounding the circus competition and the demolition of the CMEA building with the most renowned architectural critic of our time. A paradox emerges in the process: while nostalgia for the Brezhnev era seems to be in vogue in Russia, a landmark building – the “axis” of the Warsaw Pact – has been sentenced to demolition. Isn’t that strange? We also find out that wow-architecture has made a comeback as a post-COVID trend. However, to make a truly powerful statement, professionals still remain indispensable.
Exposed Concrete
One of the stages of improving a small square in the town of Lermontov was the construction of a skatepark. Entrusting this part of the project to the XSA team, the city gained a 250-meter trick track whose features resemble those of land art objects – unparalleled in Russia in both scale and design. Here’s a look at how the experimental snake run in the foothills of the Caucasus was built.
One Step Closer To the Dream
The challenges of getting all the mandatory approvals, an insufficient budget, and construction site difficulties did not prevent ASADOV Bureau from achieving its main goal in the realization of the school project in the town of Troitsk – taking another step away from outdated notions of educational spaces toward creating a fundamentally new academic environment.
Chalet on the Rock
An Accor hotel in Arkhyz, designed by A.Len, will be situated at the gateway to the resort’s main tourist hubs. The architects reinterpreted the widely popular chalet style while adding an unexpected twist – an unfinished structure preserved on the site. The design team transformed this remnant into an exciting space featuring an open-air pool and a restaurant with panoramic views of the region’s highest mountain ridges.
Sergey Skuratov: “By and large, the project has been realized in line with the original ideas”
In this issue, we talk to the chief architect of Garden Quarters, looking back at the history and key moments of a project that took 18 years to develop and has now finally been completed. What interests us most are the transformations that the project underwent during construction, and the way the “necessary void” of public space was formed, which turned this remarkable complex into a fragment of a whole new type of urban fabric – not just at the horizontal “street” level but in its vertical structure as well.
A Unique Representative
The recently concluded year 2024 can be considered the year of completion for the “Garden Quarters” residential complex in Moscow’s Khamovniki. This project is well-known and, in many ways, iconic. Rarely does one manage to preserve such a number of original ideas, achieving in the end a kind of urban planning Gesamtkunstwerk. Here is a subjective view from an architecture journalist, with an interview with Sergey Skuratov soon to follow.
Field of Life
The new project by the architectural company PNKB (an acronym for “Design, Research, and Advisory Bureau”), led by Sergey Gnedovsky and Anton Lyubimkin, for the Kulikovo Field Museum is dedicated to the field as a concept in its own right. The field has long been a focus of the museum’s thorough and successful research. Accordingly, the exterior of the new museum building is gentler than that of its predecessor, which was also designed by PNKB and dedicated specifically to the historic battle. Inside, however, the building confidently guides the visitor from a luminous atrium along a spiral path to the field – interpreted here as a field of life.
A Paper Clip above the River
In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Living in the Architecture of One’s Own Making
Do architects design houses for themselves? You bet! In this article, we are examining a new book by TATLIN publishing house. This book – unprecedented for Russia – features 52 private homes designed and built by contemporary architects for themselves. It includes houses that are famous, even iconic, as well as lesser-known ones; large and small, stylish and eccentric. To some extent, the book reflects the history of Russian architecture over the past 30 years.
A City Block Isoline
Another competition project for a residential complex on the banks of the Volga in Nizhny Novgorod has been prepared by Studio 44. A team of architects led by Ivan Kozhin concluded that using a regular block layout in such a location would be inappropriate and developed a “custom design” approach: a chain of parceled multi-section buildings stretching along the entire embankment. Let’s explore the features and advantages of this unconventional method.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Terraced Design
The “River Park” residential complex has confidently and securely shaped the Nagatinsky Backwater shoreline. Featuring a public embankment, elevated courtyards connected by pedestrian bridges, and brick façades, the development invites exploration of its nuanced response to the surrounding context, as well as hints of the architects’ megalithic design thinking.
A Kremlin’s Core and Meteorite Fragments
We continue our coverage of the competition projects for the residential district that the development company GloraX plans to build along the embankment of the Rowing Channel in Nizhny Novgorod. ASADOV Architects approached the concept through a deep dive into local identity, using storytelling to pinpoint a central idea for the design: the master plan and composition are imagined as if a meteorite had struck a “proto-Kremlin”. Sounds weird? Find more details below!
The Volga Regatta
GloraX plans to develop a residential complex spanning 14 hectares along the Volga River in Nizhny Novgorod. The winning design in a closed-door competition, created by GORA Architects, features housing typologies ranging from townhouses to terraced high-rise slabs, a balance of functions, diverse ways of engaging with the water, and even a dedicated island (no less!) for the city residents.
Life Plans
The master plan for the residential district “Prityazheniye” (“Gravity”) in Naberezhnye Chelny was developed by the architectural company A.Len, taking into account the specific urban planning context and partially implemented solutions of the first phase. However, the master plan prioritized its own values: a green framework, a system of focal points, a hierarchy of spaces, and pedestrian priority. After this, the question of what residents will do in their neighborhood simply doesn’t arise.
A New Track
We took a thorough look at D_Station, a railcar repair depot dating back to 1906, recently reconstructed while preserving its century-old industrial structure, upon the project by Sergey Trukhanov and T+T Architects. Though work on the interiors – set to house restaurants and public spaces – is still underway, the building’s exterior already offers plenty to see. Visitors can explore the blend of old and new brickwork, appreciate the architect’s unique interpretation of ruin aesthetics, and enjoy the newly built pedestrian route that connects the Citydel Business Center’s arches to Kazakova Street.
Four Different Surveys
The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
Scheduled Evolution
ASADOV Architects unveiled the EvyCenter pavilion, a microcultural hub for fostering personal growth, organizing workshops, and doing gymnastics. Additionally, this pavilion serves as a prototype for a scalable country house, drawing inspiration from the “Loskutok” project, and constructed from CLT panels in a factory. This marks the beginning of a developer project initiated by the architectural firm (sic!), which is seeking partners to expand both small Evy settlements and even larger Evy cities, which are, according to Andrey Asadov, aimed at fostering the “evolutionary” development of the people who will inhabit them.
The Golden Crown
The concept for a dental clinic in Yekaterinburg, developed by CNTR Studio, revolves around the idea of a “mouth full of gold”: pristine white porcelain stoneware walls are complemented by matte brass details. To avoid an overly literal interpretation, the architects focused on the building’s proportions, skillfully navigating between sunlight requirements and fire safety regulations.
Flexibility and Integration
Not long ago, we covered the project for the fourth phase of the ÁLIA residential complex, designed by APEX. Now, we’ve been shown different fence concepts they developed to enclose the complex’s private courtyards, incorporating a variety of public functions. We believe that the sheer fact that the complex’s architects were involved in such a detail as fencing speaks volumes.
A Step Forward
The HIDE residential complex represents a major milestone for ADM architects and their leaders Andrey Romanov and Ekaterina Kuznetsova in their quest for a fresh high-rise aesthetic – one that is flexible and layered, capable of bringing vibrancy to mass and silhouette while shaping form. Over recent years, this approach has become ADM’s “signature style”, with the golden HIDE tower playing a pivotal role in its evolution. Here, we delve into the project’s story, explore the details of the complex’s design, and uncover its core essence.
Gold in the Sands
A new office for a transcontinental company specializing in resource extraction and processing has opened in Dubai. Designed by T+T Architects, masters of creating spaces that are contemporary, diverse, flexible, and original, this project exemplifies their expertise. On the executive floor, a massive brass-clad partition dominates, while layered textures of compressed earth create a contextually resonant backdrop.
Layers and Levels of Flight
This project goes way back – Reserve Union won this architectural competition at the end of 2011, and the building was completed in 2018, so it’s practically “archival”. However, despite being relatively unknown, the building can hardly be considered “dated” and remains a prime example of architectural expression, particularly in the headquarters genre. And it’s especially fitting for an aviation company office. In some ways, it resembles the Aeroflot headquarters at Sheremetyevo but with its own unique identity, following the signature style of Vladimir Plotkin. In this article, we take an in-depth look at the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) headquarters in the Moscow agglomeration town of Zhukovsky, supplemented by recent photographs from Alexey Naroditsky – a shoot that became only recently possible due to the fact that improvements were finally made in the surrounding area.
Light and Shadow
In this article, we delve into the architectural design of the “Chaika” house by DNK ag architects, which was recently completed in 2023 as part of the collection of signature designs at ZILArt. As is well-known, all the buildings in this complex follow a design code, yet each one is distinct. This particular building stands out not only for its whiteness and minimalism but also for the refined use of a limited number of techniques that, together, create what can confidently be called synergy.
Casus Novae
A master plan was developed for a large residential area with a name of “DNS City”, but now that its implementation began, the plan has been arbitrarily reformatted and replaced with something that, while similar on the surface, is actually quite different. This is not the first time such a thing happens, but it’s always frustrating. With permission from the author, we are sharing Maria Elkina’s post.